At some point in time, we all face the harsh reality of aging. It’s the time when looking at the mirror makes us realize that time has taken much toll on us and that we look a lot less like, well, us. The gravity and age certainly have a big impact on our facial features as we start to experience increasing wrinkles and fine lines on our faces.
Well, thanks to the advancement in cosmetic surgery, today we have multiple features to minimize (if not completely stop) the impact of aging. But which is the right facial rejuvenation feature for you? Many people do compare fat transfer vs filler as two of the more preferred facial rejuvenation procedures and if you are also looking for answers to your quest for fat transfer vs. filler cosmetic procedures, keep reading as we have brought all that you need to know about these two procedures.
Ok, before we get into the comparison of fat transfer vs. filler, let’s briefly look into the history of facial rejuvenation procedures. Fat grafting started back in the 1980s when surgeons were able to suck out fat tissues from the belly or bottom parts of the body and reinject the fat into the face – yup that was a revolution back then.
However, soon enough the synthetic dermal filler made their way into the market as a faster and non-surgical competitor to fat grafting and quickly gain traction amongst people looking to rejuvenate their facial features.
Now, enough talking let’s start digging into each of the two facial rejuvenation methods and see which one is right for you.
- Fat Transfer Vs. Fillers – which one is right for you?
Well, to better compare two procedures we will be comparing individual features of both the procedures, so you have all your answers and make a well-informed decision.
- Fat transfer vs. fillers: Which is longer lasting?
Fat grafting is the clear winner here as it’s a permanent procedure. Whereas, synthetic fillers have their expiry date. Once the synthetic fillers pass their expiry date, they are broken down and absorbed in the body, which means you will need yet another session with the surgeon.
- Fat Transfer Vs. Fillers: Which is safer?
Ok, while both of the procedures are safe, the psychology of many patients makes them think fat transfer as a safer option, as it will include their tissues and no chance of an allergic reaction. However, the synthetic fillers also are completely safe as they are prepared in the lab with minimal chances of allergic reactions. Nonetheless, fat grafting will again take the point here.
- Fat Transfer Vs. Fillers: which procedure produces better results?
During the fat transfer, the surgeon will use a multi-layered technique to facilitate an easy mixing of the injected fat with existing fat. However, there is some rare chance of lumping to occur. While these lumps tend to disappear in a short time, if not, they can alternatively be removed.
The chances of lumping are also present in synthetic fillers, especially if they are injected too near to the surface.
So, no one gets a point in here and you can take chances with both.
- Fat Drafting Vs. Fillers: which comes with a higher downtime?
Ok, when it comes to downtime, synthetic fillers are definitely the winner in here. That’s because, while a fat grafting procedure may take upward of two hours for the procedure, the downtime is considerably large as it involves two separate procedure:
Here, the fat will be squeezed out of the fatter areas of the body (mostly from hips, bottoms or belly area). Now, while with the advanced technology only a small incision is required to squeeze the fats, it still takes time. Moreover, once it is squeezed, it will then have to be isolated using a centrifuge.
2. Fat injections
Moving on, the isolated fat tissues will then have to be injected into the desired facial areas.
Contrarily, no such steps are required in synthetic fillers. There is no requirement for anesthesia or incisions. It is performed in a short time in the surgeon’s office and you will get instant results.
So, with the clear distinction, synthetic fillers get the point here.
- Fat Transfer Vs. Fillers: Which is more painful?
Again, dermal fillers are the clear winner here. As already described, fat grafting involves a good two-weeks recovery time. Plus, while you may not experience any pain during the operation, the surgeon will most probably prescribe painkillers for pain-relieving afterward. Moreover, while there is no overnight stay in the hospital involved in fat grafting, however, you will need someone to drive back home.
Last but not the least, while the fat transfer is a highly-safe procedure, when we are talking about surgical procedure there’s always a certain risk involved that may include:
– Infection risk at the injected area
– Skin necrosis
– Tissue death
Contrarily, there’s nothing such involved in dermal fillers. The entire procedure will involve the use of a very fine medical needle to inject fillers at the desired site, with little to no swelling or bruising. Again, dermal fillers get the point here.
- Fat Transfer Vs. Fillers: which procedure costs more?
Fat transfer costs more, that’s a no brainer. That’s because it involves two separate steps including; liposuction and fat transfer. However, looking at the bigger picture, fat grafting is a permanent fix, whereas, dermal fillers need to be redone periodically. Thereby, even with a higher initial cost, fat grafting is more cost-effective of the two.
- Fat Transfer Vs. Fillers: which five results quicker?
Again, dermal fillers are the clear winner here. As a non-surgical process, you will be able to see instant results as compared to fat grafting which involved multiple treatments and longer downtime. Generally, it can take up to six months to discover the complete fat grafting benefits.
Contrarily, the results of dermal fillers are instant, with minimal downtime. So, it clearly takes the point here.
So, who’s the winner in the tug between fat transfer vs. fillers?
Well, it depends on you. Especially it depends on your psychology, whether you are ready to go under the knife for a surgical procedure (fat transfer) or choose a non-invasive procedure (dermal fillers). We have broken down the pros and cons of each and now it’s you that has to choose the right procedure for yourself.